Skip to main content

Author: Aidan Cahill

Upstate Status Secure: MTA not coming to Capital Region

Governor Kathy Hochul has announced that the planned Metro North train between Albany and New York City has been shelved.

An announced MTA train running from Albany to New York has been canceled as Amtrak resumes full service between the Empire State Capital and its largest city. 

The announcement was made in a statement released by New York Governor Kathy Hochul on January 27. In it, she said that because of the full restoration, Amtrak would no longer sanction the MTA trains to run between Poughkeepsie and Albany. 

Hochul didn’t close the door to an MTA line to Albany, however, especially given the excitement surrounding the initial announcement. 

“I remain fully committed to short and long-term proposals to bring better transit – including expanded Metro-North service if the demand exists – beyond Poughkeepsie and into the rest of the Hudson Valley and Capital Region,” Governor Hochul said. “New Yorkers rely on high quality rail transit like no other state, and I will always fight to save commuters time and to make service better.” 

The limited service didn’t stop ridership on Amtrak in 2025. While New York City makes up 84% of all Amtrak travel in the state with 13,037,414 people getting on and off at Penn Station in 2025, the Capital region dominates the rest of the state. 

The five stations in the Capital Region  — Albany, Schenectady, Saratoga Springs, Amsterdam and Glenns Falls — account for a combined 1,142,152 people transiting through on Amtrak. Albany makes up the majority of this total with 920,779 people transiting through. 

In addition to ridership, Amtrak spent $16,074,743 on station improvements in the Capital Region in 2025 with $9,131,070 being spent on Saratoga Springs alone — the most of any station in the state. 

Clifton Park Bans Battery Energy Storage Systems

A 2025 fire in Warwick, New York (seen here) was one of the main drivers behind Clifton Park’s decision to ban battery storage facilities in the town (Courtesy of the Village of Warwick)

The Town of Clifton Park has voted to ban battery energy storage in the town — effectively preventing future projects from going forward. 

The ban came after two public hearings to consider whether to just extend the current moratorium put in place last year or outright ban the structures within Clifton Park. 

During the hearings, most of the people who spoke were in opposition to battery storage facilities, arguing that the technology was too new to be considered safe and had significant environmental concerns. They included engineers and three fire chiefs who said that if one of the systems were to catch fire, then they would have limited ability to fight it. 

“If really you think that it’s a good idea to put these systems in our town, I invite you when it does catch on fire to show up with me and all of our folks, put an air pack on and try and fight that fire,” Tim Kimball, Chief of Vischer Ferry Volunteer Fire Company, said. “I don’t care if it’s an energy storage system, a Tesla, a cell phone that’s caught fire in somebody’s pants, whatever it is. It’s the tech. You can’t put them out.” 

Kimball also warned that should a fire happen at one of these sites, there would be potentially miles wide evacuations due to toxic smoke from the fire. He also said that it would require firefighters to be on scene for days to try and ensure the fire doesn’t spread, and people don’t get too close to the burning battery. 

An incident cited by multiple commenters was the December 19, 2025, fire at a battery storage facility in Warwick, New York. According to Warwick Mayor, Michael Newhard, this fire was caused by possible moisture infiltration of the units. This fire was left to burn out on its own with local responders monitoring air, water, and soil contamination. 

This incident wasn’t the first such incident in Warwick with a 2023 fire prompting more regulations from the Village with which Mayor Newhard alleges they did not comply. 

It was these concerns that led the Town Council to pass both the moratorium and the outright ban of battery storage facilities, with members saying that without further research on the impact of these facilities, they can’t support allowing them in Clifton Park. 

While Clifton Park is one of many towns to ban these energy storage facilities, a bill currently in the State Assembly and State Senate would place authority for these facilities under the prevue of State Office of Renewable Energy Siting and Electric Transmission — limiting the power of local communities to regulate the matter. 

Barrett Not Running for Reelection in 2026

Phil Barrett announced that 2026 will be his last year on the Saratoga County Board of Supervisors. He has been in office as Clifton Park Town/County Supervisor for 26 years. (Aidan Cahill)

For 26 years, Clifton Park has been consistently represented at the county level by one man: Republican Phil Barrett. 

In that time Saratoga County’s population went from 200,635 when he started to 240,360 today, while the GDP went from $5,461,772 in 2001, the earliest year available to $14,870,710 in 2023, the last year available.

Throughout all this growth and subsequent change, Barrett has represented Clifton Park in the Saratoga County Board of Supervisors and served as its chair on four separate occasions. 

In 2027, however, that will change. 

On Jan. 12, Barrett announced that this term will be his last. Barrett made the announcement on his personal blog in a post entitled “Never a Good Time,” in which he talked about his career and some of the challenges he faced. 

“I will not be seeking a 15th term as Town/County Supervisor in 2026,” Barrett said in the post. “I agreed to run in 2025, knowing the new term would be a one-year term as opposed to the historical two-year term. Although I completely disagree with the altering of the election schedule, it was a more enticing time frame based on my personal interests.” 

The former Army officer and Commercial Lender began his tenure in the position in 1999 and was subsequently elected 14 times. In 2010, he passed Henry J. Kinns for longest tenured supervisor in town history. During his tenure in office, he was only primaried once however his opponent, Dale Kelley, dropped out before the primary. 

Barrett is currently serving his fourth term as Chairman of the Saratoga County Board of Supervisors — his third consecutive after a previous term in 2007. 

In the blog post Barrett talked about his longevity in office and said he always viewed the position as a job with two-year contracts given to him by the voters. 

“I have always viewed this position as a job,” Barrett said.  “It’s an important job and a public job, but at the end of the day it’s a job. The voters have provided me the opportunity to do the job on a series of 14 two-year contracts. Perform and you may earn another contract. If you don’t perform the short-term contract may expire, permanently.” 

Barrett’s announcement comes at a time when Clifton Park will see many changes. Democrats swept all the elections they contested in 2025 in Clifton Park, leaving Barrett in the minority in the Town Board. Meanwhile, a state law goes into effect shifting elections for most jurisdictions from odd numbered years to even numbered ones — resulting in a shortened one-year term. 

As for what’s next, Barrett didn’t offer specifics but said he would still be around and won’t be leaving the area. 

Malta Police Chase ends in a Creek

A Malta man has been charged with several traffic offenses after trying to hide in a creek while feeling from a DWI. 

Bradley Crannell of Malta was charged with felony DWI, felony unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle, misdemeanor fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle, speeding, improper plates, uninspected motor vehicle, uninsured motor vehicle, failing to keep right and passing a red light. 

According to Saratoga County Sheriff’s Deputies, Crannell was initially stopped for erratic driving on East High Street in Malta. While he initially stopped for Deputies, he is alleged to have fled the area. He later abandoned the car at the former location of Spa Brahuas Restaurant on High Street and fled into the woods. 

The Sherriff’s Office subsequently deployed a drone with a thermal camera and spotted Crannell lying next to a creek. He was subsequently taken into custody without further incident. 

Crannell’s DWI was elevated to a felony due to a prior conviction. He was arraigned in Malta Town Court and remanded into the Saratoga County Jail pending further proceedings. 

Burger Busted for DWI by Park Police

– Saratoga Springs Supervisor Sarah Burger was arrested for DWI on January 11 by New York State Park Police. (Aidan Cahill)

Newly elected Saratoga Springs Supervisor Sarah Burger has been arrested for DWI. 

The arrest occurred in the early hours of Jan. 11, 2026. Burger was pulled over by New York State Park Police around 11:46 p.m. Jan. 10 and placed under arrest shortly after. She was arraigned, issued an appearance ticket, and subsequently released.  

In a statement put out after the arrest, Mattew Chavin, Burger’s lawyer, said that his client respects the rule of law and is entitled to due process. 

“I have instructed her not to comment on this matter. We are very early in the process and awaiting discovery materials,” Chauvin said. “Accordingly, I will not be making further comment beyond this statement at this time.” 

Burger’s arrest was first reported by WNYT. She is due in court on Feb. 5. 

Burger won her seat on the Saratoga County Board of Supervisors this past November and was sworn in on January 1 of this year. In her election, she received the most votes of any candidate running in a competitive race with 5,458 across the One Saratoga and Democratic party lines. 

Outside of politics, Burger is a partner at her own law firm, Burger Law Group, and served as Saratoga Springs City Attorney in 2014. 

Fugitive from Texas Caught after Police Chase in Spa City

The Saratoga Springs Police Department arrested a fugitive from Texas after receiving a report of someone driving erratically on Caroline Street. 

Jody Harr, 47, was arrested by SSPD on a slew of charges after he was caught by Saratoga Springs Police during a DWI investigation. 

According to SSPD, around 11:00 p.m., they received a report from a concerned citizen about a driver who was possibly intoxicated near the intersection of Caroline Street and Henry Street. When officers approached on foot, the driver, later identified as Harr, fled the scene. This triggered a chase which ended near the intersection of West Circular Street and Union Street. 

Harr was initially taken into custody for DWI but further investigation revealed that he was wanted in Texas related to child pornography offenses. 

He was charged with being a fugitive from justice, felony DWI- two prior convictions in the last 10 years, felony aggravated DWI, felony operating a motor vehicle with BAC over .08, misdemeanor reckless driving, and misdemeanor unlawful fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle. In addition, he received several traffic violations including passing a red light, failure to stop at a stop sign, driving to the left of pavement markings, and driving on a sidewalk. 

In an email to Saratoga TODAY, SSPD confirmed that the warrants for Harr’s arrest were issued by the Grand Prairie Police Department in Dallas County, TX. While the SSPD couldn’t cite Texas law specifically, they did state that the warrant was related to child pornography charges in Texas. 

A review of court records from the Dallas County District Court shows that Harr has been charged with one count of 3rd degree possession of child pornography. During the course of the case, prosecutors alleged in court filings that Harr sent harassing messages to an individual involved and her son. 

While bond for this case was set at $20,000, it has since been revoked. The last action related to the case took place on July 8, 2024, and the case is currently listed as inactive. This inactive status is done when something court can’t resume is due to factors beyond the control of the court — such as when a warrant is issued for the arrest of the defendant, according to the State of Texas Judicial Branch. 

As for Harr’s other charges, this is far from his first time being arrested for DWI. A review of his criminal record from the Texas Department of Public Safety shows four arrests for DWI in the state — the latest two coming in 2023 and 2017. 

Harr was remanded into the custody of the Saratoga County Sheriff’s Office pending extradition back to Texas. 

One Dead in crash at Valvoline in Town of Halfmoon

A 50 year old Schenectady man died after a crash at a Valvoline in the Town of Halfmoon. 

Sikander Samuel of Schenectady died on Jan. 12 at Albany Medical Center after he was pinned between two vehicles while working at the Valvoline on Route 9 in the Town of Halfmoon. 

The crash occurred when a vehicle waiting in line to be serviced suddenly accelerated into the vehicle in front of it which was also waiting to be serviced. As a result of the collision, the two vehicles forced a third one — which was being serviced in the bay at the time — to crash through a glass garage door at the front of the service bay. 

Samuel was initially transported to Albany Medical Center with leg fractures and possible internal injuries. No cause of death was listed at the time. Deputies said the operator of the vehicle that struck Samuel, a 63-year-old man from Schaghticoke, is cooperating with the investigation. 

The crash and death caused the Valvoline to close it’s doors for two days. It reopened on Jan. 13. In a statement to the media, the company who owns the franchise, offered their sympathy to the family. 

“Everyone across our franchise is heartbroken by the death of our colleague following the tragic incident on Saturday. Our deepest sympathies are with his family and loved ones during this incredibly difficult time,” the statement read. “We are continuing to cooperate fully with the authorities as they investigate, and we are committed to supporting his family and our entire team as we navigate this loss together.”

City Approves Agreement with State over 2020 Protests.

In their regular meeting of the new term, the Saratoga Springs City Council agreed to enact new changes to how the city handles protests after an investigation by the New York State Attorney General’s Office. 

The agreement comes after the state launched an investigation into how police and elected officials handled the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests. 

Under the terms of the agreement, the city neither confirms nor denies the findings of the investigation but agrees to implement changes and recommendations to how the police conduct operations during protests and other demonstrations. 

Under the agreement the city will agree to remove all criminal penalties for failing to file a demonstration declaration or parade permit, but they may impose fines. In addition, under the agreement elected officials are specifically forbidden from ordering or influencing the Police Department to investigate, arrest, and or engage in surveillance of anyone engaged in first amendment activities. They’re also forbidden from ordering or influencing decisions on police deployment. 

The agreement also dictates various policy changes to how the Police Department handles protests and first amendment activities. Under the agreement, the department is required designate and train designated “protest liaison” officer to assist with protests over 25 people. In addition, they must implement a four-tiered response to protests and are prohibited from investigating and surveilling individuals based solely on their involvement in first amendment activities — among other requirements. 

They’re also prohibited from treating protests differently based on the message of the protest. 

Under the agreement, the city has 90 days to implement the agreed-upon changes. Public Safety Commissioner Tim Coll said the agreement will cost the city $200,000 every year.

Public opinion was mixed on the agreement, with some saying that the agreement didn’t go far enough to address past wrongs while others said the report was one sided and shouldn’t be signed by the city.

Despite these concerns, prior to the vote the agreement received the endorsement of both Mayor John Safford and Coll. Coll said that the agreement was an alternative to litigation and that the relationship between the city and Attorney General’s office. 

“Over the past 18 months, the city has had extensive and at times spirited discussions with the OAG on this matter,” Coll said. “Ultimately, we were able to find common ground and that understanding is reflected in this agreement.” 

Ultimately, the agreement was passed by city council unanimously. After the meeting, Safford praised the agreement calling it a positive thing for the city and saying that they will continue to work with the Attorney General’s Office. Coll meanwhile said that a lot of the changes in the agreement have already been implemented and that they’ve seen positive results from the changes. 

In addition, after the agreement was approved New York Attorney General Leticia James put out a statement calling the changes the “most extensive ever secured,” by her related to first amendment activity. 

“New Yorkers have the fundamental right to speak out, organize, and protest without fear of unlawful interruption or retaliation,” said Attorney General James. “Our investigation found that Saratoga Springs repeatedly violated those rights and targeted protesters because of their message. This agreement is a significant step toward rebuilding trust between the Saratoga Springs community and its police force and will ensure everyone is able to safely express their beliefs.” 

Commission Recommends Minor Changes to City Charter

The Charter Review Commission has released a report outlining proposed changes to the Saratoga Springs Charter — the document establishing the City of Saratoga Springs. 

The changes in this phase of the Charter Review Commission’s work only require a vote of the City Council; however, further recommendations could come that would require a referendum. 

The proposed changes will be presented by the Commission at the Jan. 20 City Council meeting. During the Jan. 6 City Council meeting, Mayor John Safford praised the work of the Commission, saying that they did “exactly what I asked them to do.” 

The Commission went title by title of the charter, looking for areas to improve upon. Of the 14 Titles in the Charter, only Titles one, nine and 13 didn’t receive any changes in the initial review. 

Here is a breakdown of all the changes recommended by the Commission. 

Title 2

Title 2 of the Charter, which establishes city offices, saw changes to the position of Supervisor, how vacancies are handled and the establishment of rules for City Council. 

Under the proposed changes, the language of the charter will no longer require two supervisors, instead establishing the number as “One or more,” depending on County Law. In addition, the supervisors will no longer be required at all meetings and are instead required to report at least quarterly to City Council. 

In terms of conduct of City Council, under the proposed changes, the mayor would be required to present rules on how City Council conducts business at the start of a new term. Those rules would have to be approved by the City Council by the third meeting, or the rules revert to the previous year. 

In addition to rules of order, the Commission recommended establishing a new section of Title 2 specifically dictating that all departments establish policies and procedures regarding Freedom of Information. 

The final, and most contested recommendation came in regard to vacancies on City Council. Under the new policy, City Council has 70-90 days to call for a special election if the vacancy is over 180 days away from a general election. If the vacancy occurs less than 180 days away from a general election, then the special election can occur concurrently with the general election. The measure was recommended by a vote of 7-4. 

Title 3

Title 3, which establishes the mayor’s office, saw some minor changes. Some of these changes had to do with updates to the Charter, reflecting previously established changes to names and city codes. It also changed the requirement for comprehensive plan review to take place once every 10 years rather than every five. 

The other notable change was the official establishment of the position of City Historian, replacing the section on public information in the charter. 

Title 4 

Changes to how the city manages finances were also recommended. Under the proposed changes, the Finance Commissioner is no longer required to conduct annual random audits, instead requiring audits be done when deemed necessary. Audits of the Finance Department would also be required to be undertaken by an independent auditor designated by City Council. 

The Commission also recommended formally strengthening language in the charter that establishes repercussions for those who make illegal payments, establishing that those who make illegal payments may be subject to removal. Another notable change was the requirement that all budget transfer requests have a written explanation — rather than just those which exceed 10% of the budget. 

The final provision recommended in Title 4 is the establishment of an IT Administrator to oversee all information technology in the city and to establish a policy manual. 

Title 5 

Only minor changes were made to Title 5, which establishes the Public Works Department. Such changes include changes to language and clarification of the duties of the department. 

Title 6 

The most notable change to Title Six of the charter was the formal establishment of the Civilian Review Board. The purpose of the board is to review grievances made against the Police Department. This board was previously established by City Council and had its first meeting in May 2025. 

In addition to the Civilian Review Board, minor changes were made with updated language reflecting state law. 

Title 7 

The most proposed changes came to Title 7, which governs the Accounts Department. Under the proposed changes, the role of the City Assessor was almost completely rewritten with stronger requirements for training and certification of those who carry out the role and clarification regarding how assessments are to be carried out. 

The other change to the Accounts Department is the establishment of the position of Risk and Safety Administrator to oversee insurance matters within the city and establish a policy and procedures manual for all city departments to follow. 

Title 8 

Only one change was made to Title 8 of the Charter, which deals with legal matters. Under the proposed change, contracts with outside lawyers will now require prior approval from City Council before any services are rendered. 

Title 11 

Title 11, which deals with contracts, saw two changes and clarifications. The first was a raising of the threshold for requiring bids. Under the proposed change, the threshold for a public works project needing a notice of bids will go from $20,000 to $35,000 while the bid threshold for a purchase contract will go from $10,000 to $20,000. In addition, the selection of bids will conform to state law rather than just the lowest bidder. 

Next Steps

Mayor Safford said that the Commission will continue to review the charter and will possibly recommend larger ones down the road. As for whether these changes will be considered by City Council soon, he said that the Council will discuss the proposed changes and may or may not implement them. 

New York Bill Mandating Warning Labels on Social Media Signed into Law

A new bill signed into law by Governor Kathy Hochul will require warning labels to be displayed on any social media platform that offers auto-play or infinite scrolling and other features. 

The new law was signed on Dec. 26 and will go into effect sometime in 2026. Under the new bill, platforms would be required to display an un skippable warning when a user initially uses one of the features cited in the law and periodically based on continued use. 

“Keeping New Yorkers safe has been my top priority since taking office, and that includes protecting our kids from the potential harms of social media features that encourage excessive use,” Governor Hochul said. “New Yorkers deserve transparency. With the amount of information that can be shared online, it is essential that we prioritize mental health and take the steps necessary to ensure that people are aware of any potential risks.” 

The new legislation comes after a 2023 advisory by the U.S. Surgeon General’s Office said that children and adolescents who use social media for more than three hours a day are more than twice as likely to develop mental health symptoms than those who don’t. This was notable as the Surgeon General’s Office placed the average social media usage of those aged 13-17 at 3.5 hours a day. 

The legislation cited this advisory and subsequent calls by the Surgeon General’s Office to implement warning labels as the primary motivator behind the bill. While the law is designed to target younger users, it doesn’t specifically require that the warning exclusively target them. 

In addition to infinite scrolling and autoplay, the law also targets features such as like counts or push notifications not explicitly requested by the user. The text and scope of the warning was not written into the legislation and will be determined later by the Commissioner of Mental Health in coordination with the Commissioners of Health and Education. 

Platforms who violate the law will be subject to a maximum of $5000 or further relief, depending on what the court decides. 

New York isn’t the first jurisdiction to target social media platforms. In Oct. 2025, New York City filed a lawsuit in Federal Court against several social media platforms, accusing them of encouraging addiction through their algorithms and engaging in practices akin to gambling through features such as likes and dislikes. 

Three other states — California, Colorado and Minnesota — enacted similar legislation this year while outside the US, Australia outright banned social media for anyone under 16. 

It’s unclear what legal hurtles the New York law run into. Soon after Colorado passed it’s law requiring platforms to tell users about the dangers of social media, a lawsuit was filed by industry group NetChoice. 

As a result, their law was struck down by a federal judge in a preliminary injunction. It has since been appealed. 

“The Court fully appreciates Colorado’s legitimate effort to protect the children and adolescents of our state from the impacts of social media use on their health and wellbeing,” Judge William J. Martínez wrote in his ruling. “The Court concludes, however, that it is substantially likely NetChoice will succeed on the merits of its claims that Colorado may not pursue this laudable goal by compelling social media companies to speak its expressive messages.”