Author: John Kaufmann

---

---

Saratoga County Supreme Court Justice Dianne Freestone has ruled that the previous Saratoga Springs City Council violated the New York State Open Meetings Law (OML) by conducting city business by email. Saratoga Springs Accounts Commissioner Dillon Moran rejected the judge’s decision when he spoke to the Saratogian in an excellent article by Emma Ralls in the November 15, 2024, edition:

Moran stated to the Saratogian. “I did nothing wrong. The judge stated I did nothing wrong and the judgment reflects it.”

Dillon Moran To The Saratogian

I don’t know what opinion Moran read, but it was not the one issued by Judge Freestone on November 11. The opinion states several times that the city’s use of emails to transact business violated OML. What is not to understand about this statement:

“The court finds the respondents [JK:The city] violated the open meetings law”

Judge Dianne Fresstone’s Ruling

The Events

Last year, on October 3rd, Governor Kathy Hochul issued an edict allowing licensed liquor establishments to serve patrons early on Sunday morning to watch a special Buffalo Bills game in London, England.

In response, the previous city administration (Mayor Ron Kim, Commissioners Moran, Sanghvi, Golub, and Montagnino) used emails to authorize the local bars to open early rather than convene a special meeting.

The Council Had Conceded Back in 2023 that They Violated The Open Meetings Law

At the December 5, 2023, City Council meeting almost a year ago, there was general acknowledgment that the city had violated the Open Meetings Law in approving the early bar openings. Here, Mayor Kim concedes that they violated the OML.

Even Moran conceded it at the time:

The Lawsuit

In October of 2023, Saratoga Springs Republican Chair Mike Brandi sued the city, arguing that the city’s use of email violated the New York State Open Meetings Law. He had previously sought an opinion from the New York State Committee on Open Government (COOG). The COOG opinion confirmed the violation:

“In our opinion, a vote should have ocurred at an open meeting in compliance with the OML.”

COOG October 23, 2023

Brandi offered to withdraw his lawsuit to avoid litigation if the Council members underwent an hour and a half of training conducted by the COOG. All the other Council members agreed to the training except for Moran. His petty response necessitated the City Attorneys defending the city in New York Supreme Court. As noted earlier, the Council had already admitted to the violation, so Moran’s response was particularly belligerent, foolish, and wasteful of the taxpayers’ money.

Not An Isolated Violation

The email addressed in the lawsuit was not an isolated event. The FOIL that unearthed that violation also produced numerous other similar violations of voting done by email. Unfortunately, the other violations were exempt from litigation due to the statute of limitations.

The FOIL also revealed hundreds of texts in group messages prohibited by the Open Meetings Law. Carrying on a group text among Council members is just another example of, at a minimum, denying the public knowledge of deliberations by elected officials.

Due to the statute of limitations, Brandi could not bring these to Judge Freestone’s attention.

The Decision

In her decision, Judge Freestone agreed that the city had violated the OML but noted that their action was “unintentional, immaterial and wholly unprejudicial.” I am not a lawyer, but I think the judge meant that the Council had not intentionally violated the OML and that the action was for a minor, non-controversial issue. The Council was not trying to hide its actions from the public, which somehow mitigated their violation.

With respect to Judge Freestone, I am afraid she had her dates wrong. Governor Hochul issued her special waiver for bars on October 3, 2023. The Council began emailing about taking action on October 4. That meant that they had three days to schedule a meeting, and, in fact, they could have had their meeting on Saturday, so they actually had four days, not one day, as stated in Judge Freestone’s decision. All they needed was three Council members to convene for a few minutes.

The fundamental point remains. They did not meet the OML law requirements because they were ignorant that they were violating it, not because they did not have time.

Having been advised back in 2023 that they had violated the OML and having acknowledged their error, the real question is why Moran refused the easy solution of participating in a short course on OML, which would have resulted in Brandi agreeing to drop the lawsuit.

Dillon Moran Acts Out

Moran’s response to the Saratogian Newspaper reporter Emma Ralls demonstrates that if anyone on the Council needs training on OML, it is he.

“I find it absolutely disgusting that me doing my job and helping small businesses is somehow the subject matter of this frivolous lawsuit.”

Moran to the Saratogian

“Frankly, I was simply doing my ministerial duty and letting my peers know that I was doing it. For that, the city got a lawsuit, who knows how many wasted hours of court time,” Moran said. “When he (Brandi) continues to point fingers and say that we’re responsible for costing taxpayers money, he is wrong. I reject that because he, himself, is the cause.”

“He is the person who’s trying to criminalize our personal behavior over politics and it’s disgusting. We’re above this, or we should be above this as a community.”

Moran To Saratogian

How blind and ignorant does he think the public is? He violated the OML and refused to accept Brandi’s offer to withdraw his lawsuit if the City Council participated in a mere hour and a half of training. He then blames Brandi for the cost of litigation. He also makes a strange accusation about Brandi trying to “criminalize our personal behavior over politics.” What criminal behavior is he talking about? The OML issue is civil, not criminal.

Saratoga Springs Accounts Commissioner Dillon Moran has been engaged in a mad campaign of conflicting statements and resolutions to find a way to bail out the Saratoga Springs Democratic Committee’s failure to place a candidate on the January 28, 2025, special election ballot. With every ploy failing, at the November 6, 2024, City Council meeting, Moran and newly appointed Public Works Commissioner Hank Kuczynski, a Democrat, falsely contended they had the right to cancel the election so that Kuczynski could serve the entire rest of Golub’s term to the end of 2025.

Video From The November 6 Meeting

https://youtube.com/watch?v=_YO84yPRIAk%3Ffeature%3Doembed

The Key Points

• Moran attempts to gaslight the community by blaming Joe Suhrada, the Republican Commissioner of the Saratoga County Board of Elections, for blocking the special election when he knows that Suhrada has agreed to the election, and worse, that Cassie Bagramian, the Democratic Commissioner, is now blocking the special election.
• Having claimed that she had the authority to block the city’s special election, Bagramian could not cite any statute or legal precedent to substantiate her claim.
• At the pre-agenda meeting, Moran claimed he could retroactively alter the election calendar so that the Democratic Committee could get their candidate on the special election ballot.
• The City Attorneys issued an opinion that the city, having voted to issue the required proclamation crafted by Moran, could not alter or cancel the election.
• Despite the City Attorney’s opinion that the special election must proceed, Moran announced that there would be no special election, and he and Kuczynski declared that Kuczynski would serve Golub’s full remaining term as Commissioner of Public Works.

The Dubious Maneuvering At The County Board of Elections

At the November 6, 2024, City Council meeting, Moran elaborated at length on the fact that the County Board of Elections’ Republican Commissioner had blocked the city’s special election.

It is true that Republican Commissioner Joe Suhrada initially opposed allowing the special election, but he subsequently announced his support for it after receiving a letter from the Attorney General that he said addressed his concerns. Omitted from Moran’s rant, was that Democratic Board of Elections Commissioner Cassie Bagramian then asserted that unless the city changed the election calendar to accommodate a Democrat on the ballot, she would not allow the special election to proceed (see email below)! Apparently, Moran thought that no one would notice.

Bagramian’s Overreach

The Saratoga County Board of Elections does not have the authority to decide whether or not an election should proceed. This blogger has researched the issue, and no statutes or legal precedents grant this authority.

I emailed Democratic Commissioner Bagramian several times, asking her to provide the legal basis for her claim of authority. While she wrote back to me, she failed to acknowledge that there was even a question about her authority, let alone provide documentation.

Moran’s False Claim That He Could Change The Election Calendar To Get A Democrat On The Ballot

At the pre-agenda meeting on November 4, 2024, Moran presented the other Council members with a revised special election calendar. The new dates would allow the Saratoga Springs Democratic Committee to place their candidate on the ballot. He advised his colleagues that he would submit the new calendar for a vote at the November 6, 2024, Council meeting.

The City Attorneys’ Opinion Blows Moran’s Revised Calendar Out Of The Water

Unfortunately for Moran, City Attorneys David Harper and Tony Izzo issued an opinion that the special election, having been properly “proclaimed” (Moran himself had drafted it), could not be modified or canceled. As documented in the video, Moran, who is not an attorney, damned the opinion as “intellectually dishonest.”

Moran and Kuczynski Assert That There Will Be No Special Election and That Kuczynski Will Serve Out The Commissioner of Public Works Term

As noted above, neither the County Board of Elections nor the City Council can alter an officially proclaimed election.

Putting aside the City Attorneys’ opinion, it is worth noting that the City Charter states that the Council can appoint a person to fill a vacancy only “until the end of the official year in which said vacancy occurs”[Sec. 2.4] So, even according to the charter, neither Moran nor Kuczynski had the authority to announce that Kuczynski could serve the entire term. According to my calendar, the year will end in less than two months, and the term runs through all of 2025.

It Won’t Work

Moran’s and Kuczynski’s arrogance and hubris in thinking that they can cancel the special election and then simply announce that Kuczynski will stay on the Council till the end of 2025 are stunning. Apparently, they are operating in a bubble that confuses what they want with what is legal.

---

This is a screenshot of a post from the Saratoga Springs Democratic Committee’s Facebook page.

This blogger lives in a different universe than the Saratoga Springs Democratic Committee.

To this blogger, being an elected official requires the highest standards of ethics. The people have elected their officials because they believe these men and women will scrupulously avoid abusing their position by drawing on the city’s resources for personal use. I cannot believe this is even debatable. Yet, we have two clear instances in which former Saratoga Springs Public Works Commissioner Jason Golub and current Public Works Deputy Joe O’Neill exploited the trust of this community by using city employees and city materials to work on private premises, and the Democratic Committee dismisses this behavior by blaming it on alleged racism and revenge.

I find it particularly discouraging that the committee would stoop to using racism to dismiss wrongdoing.

I take no pleasure in the exposure of these two men’s actions, nor do I hope that the penalties they may incur will be severe. I know this kind of petty corruption is too common in our country. Still, I am proud that in pursuing these charges, this city announces that what may be business as usual in other cities will not be tolerated in Saratoga Springs. Rather than cast doubt on the integrity of our police department as the Democratic Committee has done, I am proud of them.

As an enrolled Democrat, I ask: Is there not one member of the Saratoga Springs Democratic Committee who will speak out regarding their committee’s behavior in this matter?

Saratoga Springs Accounts Commissioner Dillon Moran has inserted himself into the news stories on the charges against ex-Public Works Commissioner Jason Golub and Department of Public Works Deputy Joe O’Neill III. Following the disclosure of the charges for Official Misconduct, a Class A misdemeanor, Moran contacted the media to attempt damage control on behalf of his friend, Jason Golub.

Neither Moran nor Golub’s lawyer denies that public employees did work on the Commissioner’s private home. Moran’s strategy is to simply belittle the fact that Golub, rather than spend money like the rest of us to hire a plumber to fix a plugged-up sink, had employees under him make two visits to his home when he was present to solve his problem. Moran then attempts to divert attention from this misconduct by making wild accusations against Public Safety Commissioner Tim Coll and the Saratoga Springs Police.

Moran tries to confuse the public and divert attention from the charges against Golub by claiming that Coll and the SSPD had some dark ulterior desire to destroy Golub. His narrative conveniently ignores that the investigation was prompted not by Coll or the police but by the New York State Comptroller, who referred it to the State Police. Moran also ignores that Coll has no authority to direct the police to bring charges or make an arrest. It is curious that Moran focuses only on Golub and doesn’t even try to explain the similar charges against O’Neill

Commissioner Moran’s Attacks on Coll and SSPD:

“It should be deeply troubling to everyone that the Public Safety Commissioner Coll and the Saratoga Springs Police Department intend to charge former city Commissioner Jason Golub with a crime based on a jug of Drano and a clogged sink,” Moran said. “This is more about the city’s law enforcement priorities and suspect motivations. We have reached a new low in the city.”

Times Union November 7, 2024

I have to admit, Mike Brandi’s obsession with me is flattering. Unfortunately what we are dealing with is a pattern of attacks on former Commissioner Golub by Tim Coll the citizen and Tim Coll the DPS Commissioner.

“No further comment” isn’t an acceptable response to the intentional personal destruction he is causing. [JK: It is inappropriate for public officials to engage in public comment in an ongoing investigation. A lesson that Commissioner Moran has never learned.]

We need to ask, why are you attacking this man for a second time?

Moran’s Facebook Page

City Accounts Commissioner Dillon Moran also issued a statement on the matter calling it “deeply troubling” that Public Safety Commissioner Tim Coll and the police department intend to charge Golub with a crime based on this.

“This is more about the City’s law enforcement priorities and suspect motivations. We have reached a new low in the City.”

“It is my understanding that the AG is already aware of and looking into this,” he added.

Channel 13 News

Abuse Is Abuse

I ran the federally funded Saratoga County Economic Opportunity Council (now LifeWorks Community Action) for sixteen years. I fully understood that as the chief executive, I could not cross a line by using employees under me to do any work for me personally.

Apparently, Moran has no such inhibitions. If he feels it was OK for his fellow Commissioner to use public employees to do work on his private home, one has to ask, what “minor” uses of public resources does Moran feel he is eligible for?

It is unconscionable for Moran to use the reasonable application of the law in the case of Golub and O’Neill for acts Moran does not dispute happened to try to smear Commissioner Coll and the police by alleging that they have some unnamed, nefarious agenda.

As a registered Democrat, I find it even more troubling that the Saratoga Springs Democratic Committee promotes Moran’s narrative on their Facebook page. When did my party decide that it is perfectly ok for elected officials to have their employees perform personal services for them? Are there no committee members willing to insist on a re-examination of this decline in ethics?

Today, November 7, 2024, the Saratoga Springs Office of Public Safety issued a press release stating that on November 1, 2024, the Saratoga Springs Police Department issued appearance tickets to former Public Works Commissioner Jason Golub and Public Works Deputy Joe O’Neill to appear in City Court on November 21, 2024.

The press release states that the two men have been charged with “Official Misconduct” under NYS Penal Law 195(1), a Class A misdemeanor.

The charges arose from the alleged use of city employees to work on private residences, in Golub’s case, his home. An earlier blog post documented the facts of this case.

Class A Misdemeanor

In New York, a Class A misdemeanor is the most serious type of misdemeanor charge. A conviction for a Class A misdemeanor can result in:

• A fine
• Community service
• Up to one year in jail
• Probation
• Driver’s license suspension
• State surcharges
• An order of protection 

Some examples of Class A misdemeanors include:

• Assault in the third degree
• Petit larceny
• Theft of services
• Unauthorized use of a computer
• Forcible touching
• Criminal possession of a controlled substance in the 7th degree
• Resisting arrest 

Misdemeanors are less serious than felonies, but a conviction can still have consequences. For example, a misdemeanor conviction can make it difficult to get certain jobs or attend college. 

I expect that the readers of this blog are as tired as I am of the chronicles documenting Accounts Commissioner Dillon Moran and Finance Commissioner Minita Sanghvi’s misrepresentations, badgering, and false statements.

This most recent Saratoga Springs City Council meeting on September 17, 2024, was particularly disturbing. Moran and Sanghvi simply used this meeting, as they have done regularly, to spread false information and berate and try to humiliate Mayor John Safford. The meeting included patently untrue statements by them, but because the Mayor’s and Public Safety Commissioner Tim Coll’s responses are quietly civil, these two men are drowned out by Moran and Sanghvi.

Once again, the issue was filling the vacancy created when Jason Golub resigned his position as Commissioner of Public Safety. As described in the previous post, both Sanghvi and Moran had submitted badly flawed resolutions at the September 3 Council meeting that did not pass, calling for a special election in 2024. Moran had placed his defeated motion on the agenda (twice!) for the September 17 meeting.

Given the document from the New York State Board of Elections that was in the hands of all the Council members, why did Moran bother to reintroduce his resolution that had failed twice at the previous meeting, and why did the contentious discussion of a special election consume so much of the Council’s time and energy?

The State Board of Elections Letter

The Council had asked City Attorney Tony Izzo to seek an opinion from the New York State Board of Elections regarding the viability of holding a special election to fill Golub’s vacancy . The following was the Board’s response, which indicates, as I read it, that the special election pushed for by Moran and Sanghvi for this year cannot take place. The letter states, “Under state law, a vacancy that occurs after that date (August 5, 2024) would be on the ballot to fill the vacancy in November of 2025.” In spite of pressure from the city Democratic Committee, Golub left his position after this date.

Here is the letter:

Commissioner Coll and Mayor John Safford have repeatedly stated that they were in full support of holding a special election to fill this vacancy, but they wanted to make sure that such an election would be legal. Sanghvi and Moran have repeatedly characterized their position incorrectly as being opposed to holding an election to fill Golub’s vacancy.

This letter was circulated to all the Council members and their deputies. Despite Commissioner Coll’s interjection of its existence during the Council’s deliberations, neither Moran nor Sanghvi acknowledged it, nor did the press when it covered this meeting.

The letter does decline to address anything in the city’s charter related to elections and suggests that such questions should be directed to the New York State Attorney General’s Office.

So the language in the letter from the New York State Board of Elections can be read two ways.

Their declaration that there can be no special election until 2025 can be seen as unequivocal on the one hand. On the other hand, the letter declined to address the language in the local charter. This blogger considers it a stretch to believe that the letter allowed for the possibility that the language of the city’s charter superseded state law. Still, an argument can be made to that effect.

In an earlier post, I explored this issue of the contradictory language regarding special elections in the city charter.

What appears crystal clear to this blogger is that the legality of holding a special election is, at a minimum, unclear. Coll and Safford were more than reasonable in asking our city’s attorneys to rigorously resolve the outstanding legal issues before proceeding.

A Resolution on a Special Election Passes

In the end the resolution put forward originally by Finance Commissioner Minita Sanghvi and then modified by Accounts Commissioner Dillon Moran at the September 3 Council meeting was passed unanimously, but only after a significant friendly amendment offered by Public Safety Commissioner Tim Coll was accepted requiring an opinion from the City Attorney that the election being requested by Moran was lawful.

Moran and the media focused on the original part of the resolution, proclaiming that an election to fill Golub’s seat before the end of the year would now be held. A careful look at the amendment to the resolution, coupled with the document from the New York State Board of Elections presented at the meeting, indicates that the legality of holding a special election in 2024 is, at a minimum, unclear.

Nevertheless, when the amended resolution passed unanimously, Moran proclaimed, “We’re having an election, people.”

Every major media outlet covering the meeting had headlines trumpeting Moran’s statement that with the adoption of this resolution, a special election will be held this year. More rigorous reporters would have taken note of the significance of Coll’s amendment.

It should be noted that reporters are not the authors of the headlines for their stories. However, it is reasonable to argue that the poverty of their reporting prompted these headlines.

Headlines In Local Media

Saratogian Newspaper

‘We’re having an election people’:Saratoga Springs City Council can start process on filling empty Public Works Commissioner seat’

Daily Gazette

Saratoga Springs to hold special DPW commissioner election by end of year

Times Union

Special election for council seat called in Saratoga Springs

WAMC

Saratoga Springs City Council begins moving to fill DPW vacancy

Saratoga Today

Musical Chairs: City Moves to Fill Vacant Council Seat 

The Position of Mayor Safford and Commissioner Coll

Coll and Safford could have killed the resolution by simply voting no. This blogger views their response as both thoughtful and generous. They agreed to Moran and Sanghvi’s resolution as long as it included language requiring that the city’s attorneys determine the legality of the special election.

The part of the resolution directing the request for a special election to the board of elections will be meaningless if it is determined that the special election would be illegal.

I understood why Safford and Coll agreed to the compromise. They simply wanted to resolve the legality issue and end the toxic and pointless arguments.

It was especially ungracious that the last word in the discussion was Moran announcing triumphantly, “People, we will have an election.” Regrettably, he successfully got an uncritical press to publish headlines as though the issue were resolved. For thoughtful people, that “victory” is very much in doubt.

Filling The DPW Vacancy-Sanghvi and Moran have a plan but is it legal?

At the Saratoga Springs City Council meeting on September 3, 2024, Finance Commissioners Minita Sanghvi and Accounts Commissioner Dillon Moran both tried to pass resolutions setting a date for a special election to fill the Commissioner of Public Works vacancy created when Jason Golub vacated the position. Notwithstanding their claims that their resolutions were based on alleged research and that they were following the city charter, both Sanghvi’s resolution and the modified one presented later by Moran were seriously flawed. Both resolutions failed. The issue was raised again at the September 17 meeting. More on that in the next post. For now-here is Round 1.

Sanghvi’s Resolution

Here is the resolution Commissioner Sanghvi put on her agenda for the September 3 City Council meeting:

A casual reading reveals the first problem with Commissioner Sanghvi’s resolution. It requests a special election, but there is no indication of who this request is being directed to. It’s kind of like “to whom it may concern.” As it turns out, there was confusion between Sanghvi and Moran as who this resolution was supposed to go to.

During the two discussions (more on that later), Moran and Sanghvi offered several explanations as to whom their request for an election would be directed. At one point, it was to the Saratoga County Board of Elections (Sanghvi), and at another, it was to the Governor (Moran), sometimes it was the Attorney General, sometimes it was the New York State Board of Elections.

Sanghvi’s resolution also set the date for the special election to coincide with the upcoming November 5 general election. She argued that doing so would save money and that, as it was a national election, it would draw the most voters.

While her arguments were valid, she seemed to have conveniently forgotten or chose just to ignore that the November 5 option had been off the table for some time. Jason Golub would have had to leave office by August 5 to allow for the 90-day window required to schedule a special election on November 5. I am told the city Democrats put considerable pressure on Golub to leave office by that date but were unsuccessful. Sanghvi had to be aware of all this.

Mayor John Safford and Public Safety Commissioner Tim Coll explained that to adopt a resolution like this that sets a specific date for a special election, the city attorneys would first need to properly research the law and provide the Council with a clarifying memorandum to ensure that they would be requesting an election that was indeed legally allowable.

Sanghvi claimed that David Harper, the City Attorney, had approved her resolution and that sending this resolution to the Saratoga County Board of Elections would somehow initiate the election. Sanghvi asserted that it was the only way to determine what procedure should be followed. Why someone couldn’t just pick up the phone and ask this question without passing a resolution requesting an election be held on a particular date was never explained by Sanghvi.

Harper was called to the microphone and told the Council members that he had simply approved the resolution’s format, not its content. He told the Council he had no expertise in election law to determine whether the resolution was consistent with city and state law. He observed that further research should be initiated.

A Pointless And Acrimonious Deliberation

It was crystal clear that neither Coll nor Safford would support a resolution adopting a date for a special election without further clarification as to the legality of the request. This did not restrain Moran and Sanghvi from offering contradictory arguments or scurrilously and falsely implying and, at times, stating outright that Coll and Safford opposed holding any election to fill the vacancy.

Commissioner Coll responded to Sanghvi by noting that he had contacted the Saratoga County Board of Elections and was told that any date selected for a special election would, at a minimum, have to allow at least a ninety-day window so that members of the armed forces could receive ballots and return them. Coll noted that an election on November 5 would not allow for this, and so while he supported having an election, this date was a non-starter for him, and he could not vote for her resolution.

Sanghvi had repeatedly justified her resolution by stating that the city charter required a special election be held to fill a vacancy when it occurs on the Council.

While section 2.4 of the charter does call for a special election to fill a vacancy under certain circumstances, Coll noted to Sanghvi that her citations from the city charter did not include Section 12.2, which requires the city to adhere to state election law. Coll argued that while he supported having a special election, it was precipitous to schedule one before the city’s attorneys could properly research state election law and advise the Council on what the legal options were.

What Does the City Charter Say About Special Elections?

The charter has conflicting sections on elections. At one point, it authorizes the Council to set a date and to run special elections to fill vacancies. In another section, it says that state election law establishes the terms the city must adhere to.

City Attorney Izzo explained to the Council that the conflict arose due to the city’s history. In 1915, the city held its own elections, including the design of ballots and the timing of all elections.

Subsequently, the New York State legislature established the terms and conditions of elections. Commissioner Sanghvi chose to focus on the language from the old charter and ignored the revision related to state election law.

City attorney Tony Izzo had informed the council that state law supersedes the section of the law continually referenced by Sanghvi and Moran, but the two simply ignored his admonishment.

This is the key section from the charter she did not cite. It reads:

12.2Primaries and municipal elections.

Provisions of the Election Law of the State of New York shall apply to all municipal elections and special elections of the City of Saratoga Springs and shall guide in all matters not provided in the Charter.

A primary election shall be held in accordance with Election Law of the State of New York in each odd-numbered year during the hours 12:00 noon until 9:00 p.m.

City Charter

The general municipal election shall be held on Tuesday succeeding the first Monday in each odd-numbered year, in accordance with Election Law of the State of New York.

Commissioner Coll Promotes Having The City Attorneys Research The Laws Before Any Action

https://youtube.com/watch?v=mJ1rgnZbYPs%3Ffeature%3Doembed

Sanghvi And Moran Ignore Coll And Insist On A Vote (It Fails)

Sanghvi and Moran insisted that the Council adopt her resolution. As the discussion devolves, it becomes clear that the resolution has been crafted without the required research.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=lphuc5AF87Q%3Ffeature%3Doembed

Sanghvi Agrees To Have The City Attorneys Research The Law And Advise The Council

https://youtube.com/watch?v=LvTQjMGM5Yo%3Ffeature%3Doembed

Moran Insists His Colleagues Pass A Revised Resolution

Moran has somehow appropriated the authority to present the Department of Public Works agenda to the Council in the absence of a DPW Commissioner.

Despite Sanghvi’s resolution’s failure, he tweaked it, changed the date from November 5 to December 31 (New Year’s Eve), and moved to add this new version to the DPW agenda.

This was an outrageous abuse of the dubious role he had adopted in presenting the DPW business, and I am sorry the mayor did not rule him out of order.

Moran attacked Coll and Safford and insisted on a vote. Despite Sanghvi’s earlier agreement to accept having the City Attorneys research the issue, she seconded Moran’s motion.

His resolution was also defeated, and Sanghvi reverted back to supporting the City Attorneys’ research on the issue.

Moran Never Gives Up

It is worth noting that the agenda for the next Council meeting on September 16 included the exact same resolution by Moran for setting a date for a special election by December 31 twice. It appeared as part of his Accounts Department agenda and part of the DPW agenda. The next blog will explore what happened with his resolution.

Good Government Process

This dispute is the most recent unpleasant occurrence at the Council table arising from Dillon Moran’s repeated introduction of resolutions he knows will not pass.

There is a history of how governments effectively function.

An elected official who wants to pass legislation first engages his/her colleagues in private discussions, seeking their support. This is not backroom dealing, as the body must adopt legislation in a public process. If the official cannot gather a majority to support a resolution, the general course of events is that they accept that it cannot be passed and desist from pursuing it.

There are four good reasons for this.

• If a member has questions or reservations, the proponent can respond directly to the concerns or agree to find answers to the questions raised.
• If the legislation is doomed, it avoids unnecessary conflict at the table.
• If it is doomed, it avoids wasting the time of his/her colleagues by not unnecessarily prolonging their meeting.
• It has the courtesy of not prompting citizens who may oppose or support the legislation from wasting their time attending the meeting and voicing their concerns.

Of course, there are legitimate exceptions. A legislator may believe raising a doomed resolution will help inform the public. This should, however, be the exception. To chronically submit doomed legislation will, as we have observed over the last two and a half years, contribute to a toxic atmosphere that places performance over substance.

In Moran’s case, the purpose of many of his resolutions is not that they are passed but that they serve as foils for conflict and drama at the Council table.

Saratoga Springs Accounts Commissioner Dillon Moran has been unsuccessfully trying for months to get the city to allow him to have his own attorney rather than rely on the city’s attorney. At the September 16, 2024, pre-agenda meeting, he insisted that he had the right to have his own attorney. When Mayor Safford indicated he could not support this, Moran announced that he and his staff would stop processing contracts for a month.

It is hard to believe that he will follow through on this threat, which would violate his oath of office as the Commissioner of Accounts.

The following video documents his threat.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=5zglvOcJ1sg%3Ffeature%3Doembed